🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.